Saturday, September 22, 2007

This article is a reprint I just like to keep it for future reference. I do not agreed to it totally but I do respect the writer

Dear Son,I thought I would write you this letter, which I feel is long overdue and should actually have been done much earlier. With the present euphoria of the 11th General Elections maybe I should have a man-to-man 'talk' with you about some of the realities of life. No, I am not going to talk about the 'birds and the bees', as in these modern times I am sure you could tell me more about that subject. What I want to talk to you about concerns our race, Melayu.When you came home for your semester breaks I quietly listened to your rhetoric about freedom of speech, equality of all races, eradication of poverty, and all such notions, without comment. I understand you are young and are just beginning to open your eyes to what is going on in the world; so I thought I would allow you to speak your mind. Mind you, in my days I could never speak to your grandfather is such a tone of voice. He would never tolerate my 'independent' views and would regard it as insolence. But that was then and today I appreciate the fact that the young tend to speak their minds. So I allowed you to ramble on. Now, however, it is my turn to speak my mind and I hope you too will allow me my right to speak just like I allowed you yours. I want to remind you that you are Malay, first and last. Whatever you say and do must be tempered with this in mind. This fact tends to escape you and your idealistic beliefs do not take this into consideration.You oppose the Umno-led Barisan Nasional because you say it is a corrupt government. You say it does not allow freedom of speech, association and assembly. You say it is undemocratic and despotic. And you go on and on listing everything that you perceive is wrong with it. I must remind you, however, that this is the same government that gave you, me, and your grandfather, an education. Without this government that you despise so much would we be where we are today? We would still be in the kampong planting padi like my grandfather before this.
\u003cbr\>You are looking for perfection. But perfection does not exist here on earth. Perfection only exists in the afterlife (akhirat). So you will have to wait until you die before you see this perfection. As long as you are on earth you will be faced with imperfections. So you will have to learn to live with this situation.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>I too would like to see a perfect world; a world filled with justice, equality, freedom, and all those 'modern' values you students shout about. But would you be prepared to gain all this at the expense of the Malay race?\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>I know you worked hard and fiercely campaigned for the opposition during the recently-concluded general election. And I also know you are terribly frustrated and disappointed with the outcome of the election. I will not hold my punches here. As you said, the opposition won, or could have won, but it was robbed of its win through an unfair election system and a biased Election Commission.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>I shall not insult your intelligence by denying all this, as I know you are smart enough to see things for what they are. But it is my duty as your father and as a Malay to explain certain things that maybe you have overlooked in your zeal of upholding your modern ideas.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>You must understand that the Election Commission is run by us Malays. It is there merely to ensure that we Malays retain our political power. You accuse the Election Commission of manipulating the elections and of unfair practices. This has nothing to do with fair or unfair. It is all about ensuring that we Malays do not lose our political power to the non-Malays.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>Why do you think Tunku Abdul Rahman kicked Singapore out of Malaysia? Can you imagine what would happen to us Malays if today Singapore was still part of Malaysia? The Chinese would sweep all the seats and we Malays would be reduced to a minority. Can you imagine being a second-class citizen in our own country the way the Malays in Singapore are?\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>You say you support keADILan because it is a multiracial party that fights for equality for all races. Do you know what keADILan is asking for? How can there be equality for all races? We Malays own this land and the other races are all immigrants. They do not deserve equal rights.\n",1]
);
//-->
You are looking for perfection. But perfection does not exist here on earth. Perfection only exists in the afterlife (akhirat). So you will have to wait until you die before you see this perfection. As long as you are on earth you will be faced with imperfections. So you will have to learn to live with this situation. I too would like to see a perfect world; a world filled with justice, equality, freedom, and all those 'modern' values you students shout about. But would you be prepared to gain all this at the expense of the Malay race? I know you worked hard and fiercely campaigned for the opposition during the recently-concluded general election. And I also know you are terribly frustrated and disappointed with the outcome of the election. I will not hold my punches here. As you said, the opposition won, or could have won, but it was robbed of its win through an unfair election system and a biased Election Commission. I shall not insult your intelligence by denying all this, as I know you are smart enough to see things for what they are. But it is my duty as your father and as a Malay to explain certain things that maybe you have overlooked in your zeal of upholding your modern ideas. You must understand that the Election Commission is run by us Malays. It is there merely to ensure that we Malays retain our political power. You accuse the Election Commission of manipulating the elections and of unfair practices. This has nothing to do with fair or unfair. It is all about ensuring that we Malays do not lose our political power to the non-Malays. Why do you think Tunku Abdul Rahman kicked Singapore out of Malaysia? Can you imagine what would happen to us Malays if today Singapore was still part of Malaysia? The Chinese would sweep all the seats and we Malays would be reduced to a minority. Can you imagine being a second-class citizen in our own country the way the Malays in Singapore are? You say you support keADILan because it is a multiracial party that fights for equality for all races. Do you know what keADILan is asking for? How can there be equality for all races? We Malays own this land and the other races are all immigrants. They do not deserve equal rights.
\u003cbr\>You must remember, when we gained independence in 1957, it was agreed that all these immigrants would be given citizenship as long as the Malays are allowed special rights and privileges. This is why we have a Ketuanan Melayu policy. The Chinese and Indians agreed to this 'social contract'. So we gave them citizenship. Now that they are citizens they demand equal rights. This is a breach of agreement. If they do not agree to Malays being given special rights and privileges why agree to it in 1957? They should have disagreed then. Then we could have sent them back to India and China. We did not force them to become citizens of this country. They wanted citizenship. And the terms and conditions of their citizenship was discussed and agreed upon. It was a social contract between them and us. How can they now turn around and not agree to it?\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>And this is what keADILan is fighting for. They are supporting the non-Malays in breaching the agreement made in 1957. An agreement is an agreement. If you want to break it, fine. If you no longer want to honour the agreement, then that is okay. But the clause in that agreement where they get citizenship must also be rescinded. The non-Malays will then have to go back to their own country. After all, no one is forcing them to live here. If they do not like it they can leave. But do not expect us Malays to give up our special rights and privileges which have already been agreed upon before independence.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>You say the Election Commission cheated. They did not cheat. They just ensured we Malays continue to dominate Malaysian politics till the end of time. Parties like keADILan are dangerous. They pawn the country to the non-Malays just for the sake of political power. The Election Commission cannot allow this to happen. Parties like keADILan must be wiped out from this country. Parties that collaborate with the non-Malays to rob Malays of our political power must be exterminated.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>If you think the Election Commission is there to manage fair elections then you are mistaken. It is there to ensure that political power does not fall into the hands of the Chinese. It is there to ensure that your children and grandchildren have a place in Malaysia and will not become second-class citizens in our own country.\n",1]
);
//-->
You must remember, when we gained independence in 1957, it was agreed that all these immigrants would be given citizenship as long as the Malays are allowed special rights and privileges. This is why we have a Ketuanan Melayu policy. The Chinese and Indians agreed to this 'social contract'. So we gave them citizenship. Now that they are citizens they demand equal rights. This is a breach of agreement. If they do not agree to Malays being given special rights and privileges why agree to it in 1957? They should have disagreed then. Then we could have sent them back to India and China. We did not force them to become citizens of this country. They wanted citizenship. And the terms and conditions of their citizenship was discussed and agreed upon. It was a social contract between them and us. How can they now turn around and not agree to it? And this is what keADILan is fighting for. They are supporting the non-Malays in breaching the agreement made in 1957. An agreement is an agreement. If you want to break it, fine. If you no longer want to honour the agreement, then that is okay. But the clause in that agreement where they get citizenship must also be rescinded. The non-Malays will then have to go back to their own country. After all, no one is forcing them to live here. If they do not like it they can leave. But do not expect us Malays to give up our special rights and privileges which have already been agreed upon before independence. You say the Election Commission cheated. They did not cheat. They just ensured we Malays continue to dominate Malaysian politics till the end of time. Parties like keADILan are dangerous. They pawn the country to the non-Malays just for the sake of political power. The Election Commission cannot allow this to happen. Parties like keADILan must be wiped out from this country. Parties that collaborate with the non-Malays to rob Malays of our political power must be exterminated. If you think the Election Commission is there to manage fair elections then you are mistaken. It is there to ensure that political power does not fall into the hands of the Chinese. It is there to ensure that your children and grandchildren have a place in Malaysia and will not become second-class citizens in our own country.
\u003cbr\>But the Election Commission is not the only player in this whole conspiracy. I should know as I used to work in the National Registration Department and it was our job to issue identity cards. Without these identity cards the Election Commission can do very little. Umno decides how many voters it needs and where they are needed. We will then 'generate' these voters through the issuing of identity cards. The Election Commission then registers them in the respective constituencies based on the identity cards we issue.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>So you see; I was very much a part of the system. And it was a system meant to ensure Malays remain lords of this land.\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>I hope I was able to shed some light on what, to you, must be a most perplexing situation. Never mind. You are young. Your blood is hot. Later in life you will realise and understand what I am saying today. And one day you too will be telling your hot-blooded children what I am telling you now.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>Dad.\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>-----------\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>Dear dad,\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>Thank you for your letter of 24 March 2004, which arrived yesterday via Pos Laju. Maybe from now on we should just use the regular postal service. At least it will arrive at the very latest in three days rather than six days.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>I must admit I was very surprised to receive your letter. I was at first afraid to open it lest it be some bad news from home. After all you have never written to me before and this is the first time. So I suspected it surely could not have been any good news. After reading your letter I now realise why you chose to write rather than tell me to my face what you said in that letter.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>I understand and respect your views on Ketuanan Melayu. Many of your generation, especially those who have served the government, share your same views. So you are not alone. But my generation no longer holds dear the concept of Ketuanan Melayu.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>You say we owe the government a debt for the education we have received. Are you saying you, I and grandfather, would never have received an education and would still be planting padi back in the kampong if not for the government? What about all those Africans and Latin Americans who live in third world countries just like us? They too are educated, in fact better educated than us. Do their countries also have a Ketuanan Melayu policy? If not, then how did they receive an education and how come they have a higher ratio of university graduates compared to Malaysia?\n",1]
);
//-->
But the Election Commission is not the only player in this whole conspiracy. I should know as I used to work in the National Registration Department and it was our job to issue identity cards. Without these identity cards the Election Commission can do very little. Umno decides how many voters it needs and where they are needed. We will then 'generate' these voters through the issuing of identity cards. The Election Commission then registers them in the respective constituencies based on the identity cards we issue. So you see; I was very much a part of the system. And it was a system meant to ensure Malays remain lords of this land.I hope I was able to shed some light on what, to you, must be a most perplexing situation. Never mind. You are young. Your blood is hot. Later in life you will realise and understand what I am saying today. And one day you too will be telling your hot-blooded children what I am telling you now. Dad.-----------Dear dad,Thank you for your letter of 24 March 2004, which arrived yesterday via Pos Laju. Maybe from now on we should just use the regular postal service. At least it will arrive at the very latest in three days rather than six days. I must admit I was very surprised to receive your letter. I was at first afraid to open it lest it be some bad news from home. After all you have never written to me before and this is the first time. So I suspected it surely could not have been any good news. After reading your letter I now realise why you chose to write rather than tell me to my face what you said in that letter. I understand and respect your views on Ketuanan Melayu. Many of your generation, especially those who have served the government, share your same views. So you are not alone. But my generation no longer holds dear the concept of Ketuanan Melayu. You say we owe the government a debt for the education we have received. Are you saying you, I and grandfather, would never have received an education and would still be planting padi back in the kampong if not for the government? What about all those Africans and Latin Americans who live in third world countries just like us? They too are educated, in fact better educated than us. Do their countries also have a Ketuanan Melayu policy? If not, then how did they receive an education and how come they have a higher ratio of university graduates compared to Malaysia?
\u003cbr\>The only reason we need government assistance is because we have to pay for our education and the government gives us loans to finance our education. However, if education was free, then we will not need any government assistance would we? We need government loans because there are not enough places in local universities and we have to go to an overseas university. And this costs money. But if we did not have to go overseas and could instead go to a local university then the problem of financing would be solved, as we will not need any.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>One can argue that building universities costs money. How much are we talking about? In the last 25 years or so, our national petroleum company, Petronas, has earned an estimated RM500 billion to RM750 billion in revenue. The actual figure is still a mystery as Petronas needs to report only to the Prime Minister and need not table its accounts for public perusal, not even to Parliament. Could not one or two billion of that be used to build more universities? In fact, they could even have easily spent ten billion Ringgit without feeling the pinch and many universities could have been built with that amount of money.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>As an example, look at China, a poor country that has to support 20% of the world's population. China has more than 1,000 universities. Beijing alone, whose population is less than half of Malaysia's, has more than 100 universities. If China can do it why can't Malaysia? How many universities does Malaysia have? Going by Beijing's ratio, we should have more than 200 universities. But we have less than 10% of that. Yet, on a per capita basis, we are richer than China.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>To say the Malays would never receive an education unless we have a preferential treatment policy and unless the government hands out charity to the Malays is an insult to our race. We are admitting that the Malays are failures and can only succeed with government handouts. Being the proud Malay that you are, I should imagine you would be the last to admit this. I would imagine you would want to say that the Malays can succeed under any circumstances if just given a fair chance.\n",1]
);
//-->
The only reason we need government assistance is because we have to pay for our education and the government gives us loans to finance our education. However, if education was free, then we will not need any government assistance would we? We need government loans because there are not enough places in local universities and we have to go to an overseas university. And this costs money. But if we did not have to go overseas and could instead go to a local university then the problem of financing would be solved, as we will not need any. One can argue that building universities costs money. How much are we talking about? In the last 25 years or so, our national petroleum company, Petronas, has earned an estimated RM500 billion to RM750 billion in revenue. The actual figure is still a mystery as Petronas needs to report only to the Prime Minister and need not table its accounts for public perusal, not even to Parliament. Could not one or two billion of that be used to build more universities? In fact, they could even have easily spent ten billion Ringgit without feeling the pinch and many universities could have been built with that amount of money. As an example, look at China, a poor country that has to support 20% of the world's population. China has more than 1,000 universities. Beijing alone, whose population is less than half of Malaysia's, has more than 100 universities. If China can do it why can't Malaysia? How many universities does Malaysia have? Going by Beijing's ratio, we should have more than 200 universities. But we have less than 10% of that. Yet, on a per capita basis, we are richer than China. To say the Malays would never receive an education unless we have a preferential treatment policy and unless the government hands out charity to the Malays is an insult to our race. We are admitting that the Malays are failures and can only succeed with government handouts. Being the proud Malay that you are, I should imagine you would be the last to admit this. I would imagine you would want to say that the Malays can succeed under any circumstances if just given a fair chance.
\u003cbr\>On your argument of ensuring the Malays do not lose their political domination, Dad, have you analysed the latest election results? The ruling party created 25 additional Parliamentary seats. At the same time they redrew the election boundaries. Let us take one example, Kuantan.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>In the past, Kuantan had about 70,000 voters. Then the Election Commission moved out about 20,000 Malay voters to Paya Besar. With the 'loss' of 20,000 Malay voters, Kuantan now became a 'Chinese' seat. So the ruling party had to field a Chinese candidate in Kuantan, which traditionally had been an Umno or Malay seat.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>This was done all over the country. In the attempt to defeat PAS and keADILan, both who depend on Malay votes, Malay majority constituencies were carved up and turned into 'Chinese' seats. And what is the result of all this?\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>In the recent election, Umno won only 96 seats in Peninsular Malaysia and another 11 in Sabah, a total of 107 out of 219, and slightly less than half the seats in Parliament. And the last election was supposed to be Umno's best performance ever. Imagine what it would look like if Umno had performed badly, say like in 1999?\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>Umno, which at one time had the most number of seats in Parliament, is now just the largest minority. If you want to include the PAS and keADILan seats as 'Malay' seats, though they do not regard themselves as Malay parties, then the total would be 115 seats.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>In what way do you say Umno's or the Election Commission's interest is merely to ensure that Malay political domination is not eroded. The way I see it, the manipulation of election boundaries has done exactly the opposite, erode Malay political domination. Now, I am not propagating or supporting the idea of Malay political domination mind you. I am just showing you that your argument to justify the Gerrymandering and rampant cheating in the last election as necessary in the interest of Malay political domination does not hold water. What it has done instead is to give the non-Malays a stronger voice in Parliament.\n",1]
);
//-->
On your argument of ensuring the Malays do not lose their political domination, Dad, have you analysed the latest election results? The ruling party created 25 additional Parliamentary seats. At the same time they redrew the election boundaries. Let us take one example, Kuantan. In the past, Kuantan had about 70,000 voters. Then the Election Commission moved out about 20,000 Malay voters to Paya Besar. With the 'loss' of 20,000 Malay voters, Kuantan now became a 'Chinese' seat. So the ruling party had to field a Chinese candidate in Kuantan, which traditionally had been an Umno or Malay seat. This was done all over the country. In the attempt to defeat PAS and keADILan, both who depend on Malay votes, Malay majority constituencies were carved up and turned into 'Chinese' seats. And what is the result of all this? In the recent election, Umno won only 96 seats in Peninsular Malaysia and another 11 in Sabah, a total of 107 out of 219, and slightly less than half the seats in Parliament. And the last election was supposed to be Umno's best performance ever. Imagine what it would look like if Umno had performed badly, say like in 1999? Umno, which at one time had the most number of seats in Parliament, is now just the largest minority. If you want to include the PAS and keADILan seats as 'Malay' seats, though they do not regard themselves as Malay parties, then the total would be 115 seats. In what way do you say Umno's or the Election Commission's interest is merely to ensure that Malay political domination is not eroded. The way I see it, the manipulation of election boundaries has done exactly the opposite, erode Malay political domination. Now, I am not propagating or supporting the idea of Malay political domination mind you. I am just showing you that your argument to justify the Gerrymandering and rampant cheating in the last election as necessary in the interest of Malay political domination does not hold water. What it has done instead is to give the non-Malays a stronger voice in Parliament.
\u003cbr\>Allow me to paint this hypothetical scenario. What if the non-Malay parties, even those in the ruling coalition, gang up on Umno? And what if PAS and keADILan side with the non-Malay parties in the interest of multi-racial politics, or at best, do not side with anyone? Would your Umno then still be able to defend the Ketuanan Melayu policy with less than half the seats in Parliament?\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>So you see; your loyalty to Umno based on the notion that it is defending Malay rights and privileges is flawed. Umno can only do that as long as the rest do not mount any challenge and are prepared to live and let live. However, once they decide to change things and make a move to end the Ketuanan Melayu, then there is very little Umno can do.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>I know, Dad, this fact has never occurred to you. You have always believed that Umno is invincible and that it commands the majority voice in Parliament. This is not so. In fact, even the policy of Malay as the national language and Islam as the official religion can be abolished if the majority in Parliament wishes for this to happen. Then whom does Umno turn to? The rulers? We must remember that the rulers' consent is no longer required. Even if they do not sign the law it will still automatically become law with or without their signatures.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah pointed this out in the late 1980s when he opposed the Constitutional Crisis engineered by Umno, which, may I add, our new Prime Minister, Pak Lah, opposed as well, Tengku Razaleigh asked: what if one day Umno loses its majority in Parliament and the non-Malays seek to remove Malay as the national language and Islam as the official religion? Now, said Tengku Razaleigh, it cannot be done without the rulers' unanimous consent. But once the amendments to the Constitution are made and the rulers' consent is no longer required, then the Malays face the danger of losing their language and religion plus their special rights and privileges.\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>More than twenty years ago Tengku Razaleigh saw this coming. He knew Umno would one day lose its majority in Parliament and the only thing left for the Malays would be their Raja-Raja Melayu. Today, what Tengku Razaleigh predicted has happened.\n",1]
);
//-->
Allow me to paint this hypothetical scenario. What if the non-Malay parties, even those in the ruling coalition, gang up on Umno? And what if PAS and keADILan side with the non-Malay parties in the interest of multi-racial politics, or at best, do not side with anyone? Would your Umno then still be able to defend the Ketuanan Melayu policy with less than half the seats in Parliament? So you see; your loyalty to Umno based on the notion that it is defending Malay rights and privileges is flawed. Umno can only do that as long as the rest do not mount any challenge and are prepared to live and let live. However, once they decide to change things and make a move to end the Ketuanan Melayu, then there is very little Umno can do. I know, Dad, this fact has never occurred to you. You have always believed that Umno is invincible and that it commands the majority voice in Parliament. This is not so. In fact, even the policy of Malay as the national language and Islam as the official religion can be abolished if the majority in Parliament wishes for this to happen. Then whom does Umno turn to? The rulers? We must remember that the rulers' consent is no longer required. Even if they do not sign the law it will still automatically become law with or without their signatures. Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah pointed this out in the late 1980s when he opposed the Constitutional Crisis engineered by Umno, which, may I add, our new Prime Minister, Pak Lah, opposed as well, Tengku Razaleigh asked: what if one day Umno loses its majority in Parliament and the non-Malays seek to remove Malay as the national language and Islam as the official religion? Now, said Tengku Razaleigh, it cannot be done without the rulers' unanimous consent. But once the amendments to the Constitution are made and the rulers' consent is no longer required, then the Malays face the danger of losing their language and religion plus their special rights and privileges. More than twenty years ago Tengku Razaleigh saw this coming. He knew Umno would one day lose its majority in Parliament and the only thing left for the Malays would be their Raja-Raja Melayu. Today, what Tengku Razaleigh predicted has happened.
\u003cbr\>I must repeat that I do not subscribe to the concept of Ketuanan Melayu. You do, Dad. I just want to point out that if the only reason you support Umno is to defend the Ketuanan Melayu, then that reason no longer exists. The Ketuanan Melayu will remain not because Umno says so. It will remain because the non-Umno Parliamentarians allow it to. In that case, is there any longer any reason to continue supporting Umno?\n\u003cbr\>\u003cbr\>Your son. \n",0]
);
D(["ce"]);
//-->
I must repeat that I do not subscribe to the concept of Ketuanan Melayu. You do, Dad. I just want to point out that if the only reason you support Umno is to defend the Ketuanan Melayu, then that reason no longer exists. The Ketuanan Melayu will remain not because Umno says so. It will remain because the non-Umno Parliamentarians allow it to. In that case, is there any longer any reason to continue supporting Umno? Your son.

Sunday, September 16, 2007

I am going for a paste up again I still can't find time to write a meaningful blog yet. I come across this article which I like to keep for future reference.

Opinion Sunday September 16, 2007
Re-shaping opinions on Islam
By JOHAN FERNANDEZ
New York-based Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the founder of the American Society for Muslim Advancement is regarded as one of the most eloquent and erudite Muslim leaders. His mission: to help bridge the divide between Muslims and non-Muslims. Highly regarded for his ability to explain complex issues a way easily understood by the layman, the author of What’s Right with Islam will share his thoughts as a guest columnist in the month of Ramadan.
IN EARLY July last year, on the first anniversary of the London bombings, young Muslim leaders met in Copenhagen, Denmark, to discuss the identity of Muslims in the world and their relations with the West. The gathering could not have come at a more opportune time – just after the Paris riots and the Danish cartoons episode that had further heightened Muslim-West tensions.
The Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow forum saw the urgent need for a constructive movement among young Muslims to reject and marginalise extremism.
Among the participants was prominent Western Muslim scholar, author and American Muslim spokesman Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, of New York.

IMAM FEISAL...What makes Islam so attractive that it is the fastest growing religion in the world and even in the US. This is something Westerners need to understandSince Sept 11, 2001, he has made it his mission to bridge this growing divide between Muslims and the West.
The author of What’s Right with Islam, that was among the top four non-fiction books for 2004 reviewed by The Christian Science Monitor, moderated the roundtable “Iman’s Circle” comprising young Muslims from Italy, Denmark, the United Kingdom and the United States that debated the challenge of living the Islamic way in secular society.
Feisal, the founder of the American Society for Muslim Advancement (Asma) needs little introduction in the US where he is regarded as one of the most eloquent and erudite Muslim leaders.
He speaks frequently at major US think tanks and international conferences, including the Council for Foreign Relations, the World Economic Forum in Davos, and is a familiar face on TV talk shows and panel discussions.
The imam of Masjid al-Farah, a mosque located 12 blocks from where the World Trade Centre once stood, Feisal has been able to articulate the Muslim position well.
The distinguished-looking Feisal is a voice of reason. He is able to put forth his arguments in a logical and clear manner.
He listens carefully and goes to great lengths to explain issues in the simplest terms possible, in a way easily understood by the layman.
An American now, the charismatic Feisal was born of Egyptian parents in Kuwait and spent his formative years at the Victoria Institution in Kuala Lumpur when his father, the late Tan Sri Abdul Rauf, was the first rector at the Islamic College in Klang and later with the International Islamic University.
When Feisal started Asma in 1997, his focus was to present the cultural dimension of Islam through art, culture and philosophy and to build bridges between Muslims and non-Muslims within the American demographic.
After 9/11, the need to bridge the divide led him to form the Cordoba Initiative in 2002, an inter-religious blueprint for improving relations between the Muslim world and the West and America.
“The template of our initiative is to identify the areas which we believe have been exacerbating and fuelling this divide and then to create projects that can address them,” said Feisal, who was chairman of the Cordoba Initiative, in Kuala Lumpur recently.
The group identified three major areas to be addressed.
“The first was the political dimension that we believe to be the Israel-Palestine conflict that is exacerbating Jew-Muslim relations,” he said.
He added that relations between Jews and Muslims were far better than Christians and Muslims up until 1948 with the formation of the state of Israel.
The second was in the area of the media, in particular the Western media that had been projecting Muslims and Islam in a negative light.
“We need to create projects either by being in the media or being present in the media through writing articles and books to explain what makes Islam attractive to people.
“What makes Islam so attractive that it is the fastest growing religion in the world and even in the US. This is something Westerners need to understand.”
Feisal said there was also some intra-Islamic “in-house cleaning” that Muslims had to do within the community. These were important factors that had been shaping non-Muslim opinions about Muslims and Islam.
“There are three major issues. One is the identification in the non-Muslim minds of the association of Islam with terrorism and secondly, the association of Islam with the oppression of women.
To disassociate terrorism with Islam required the explaining of political conflicts.
“In the Islamic world, the war on terrorism is seen as the war against Islam. We need to see how we can refrain the discourse on both sides so that it is not framed in that language.”
He said it was important to explain why this had happened and how it could be addressed.
“The other is to de-link the oppression of women and for that we need the participation of Muslim women.”
Feisal said that another issue was the question of “Islamic state” that was troubling many people to the point that they were very frightful at the thought of Islamic states.
He said people in the West think that Muslims want to convert their countries into Islamic states.
“There are many ways to define an Islamic state. One was the demographic way or the method used by the OIC (Organisation of Islamic Conference), where if the majority of people in a country was Muslim, the country was deemed to be an Islamic state.
“Another was when the constitution called itself Islamic, like the Islamic Republic of Iran or the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The constitution in these countries says that Islam is the state religion.”
He said that some say that an Islamic state has to be a theocracy while others say it has to be a caliphate, and still others say as long as a country complies with the principles of governance of the Syariah then it is syariah compliant in issues of governance.
Some Muslim scholars recently said that there was a misunderstanding among the Muslim populous about what an Islamic state should be like.
“One of the misconceptions is that an Islamic state is a sinless state. At the time of the Prophet, Medina was considered the ideal state but there were Muslims who were hypocrites, drunks, murderers, adulterers, etc, and the Prophet was called to act against these people.
“Even in this community in Medina it was not a sinless state. The idea that an Islamic state is a sinless state is a popular misconception that needs to be corrected.
“There are many misconceptions that need to be clarified by Muslims as to what is an Islamic state even to the point of the Quran and the sunnah.
“That is why we need to put clarity around this issue.”
Feisal said that was why the indexing or benchmarking of Islamic countries is very important.
“There is no coherence in many of these things. People need to understand the basis of it.
On his Cordoba Initiative, Feisal said they had been able to increasingly win the respect of the people of the government and the private sector; their observation was that the project had its merits.
Many heads of state, both in the West and the Islamic world, including Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, are concerned with the notion that the divide between the West and the Islamic world began way before 9/11.
“Samuel Huntington wrote about this in his book The Clash of Civilizations and 9/11 brought into people’s consciousness that there were civilization differences between Islam and the West.”
People like Iranian leader Khomeni said there is no civilization difference between the West and Islam but there is a gap.
“This gap is the perception of the fear people have and this gap is dangerous. Political, institutional and NGO leaders recognise that it is of supreme importance to address this gap.
“Our capacity to shed light on this issue is increasingly gaining the attention of people in both parts of the world.”

Saturday, September 08, 2007

Phew! It was a hectic two weeks for me. After flying off to Pontianak Kalimantan I was on the Plane again to Yangoon Burma. It was tiring but nice to visit new places. That is why I haven't keep ip with my blog. Pontianak is an interesting town and gor it's name from the she banshee or vampirela that roam the place a long time again. It seems the person who would later founded the Sultanate in pontianak was an Arabic Merchant who manage to frighten the banshee by firing the canons up in the air continoulsy. The kraton or palace is still there and rhe pontianak still exist somewhere........

In Yangoon i was suprise of the town, it reminds me of Kuala Lumpur in the 60's lot's of green and old trees,kind of nostalgic. I hate development where it means to uproot old trees and plant new ones, it is not the same! So Yangoon has a lot of it sadly we foreigners have to pay in US Dollars and do take note please bring in small note if not you will get some fakes one in return.

I have to end now because I'm off to Penang for R & R.