Monday, September 22, 2008

The politics of UMNO is getting more and more ludicrous, it is not that they are losing power but the upheaval against the present Prime Minister Dato Seri Abdullah is bordering on lunacy! He has announce he is standing for election and ask all UMNO members to support his candidacy and his plan on his retirement in 2010. The grassroot members I don't think would follow suit. Yet to highlight the detachment between the leaders in UMNO and his members is clearly shown in the press statement made.

Penang UMNO is one sad case. Below is a comment I made on a blog run by my junior who is a strong party supporter and a private doctor in Penang.

wan zaharizan b wan zan said...

Dr Novandri

Since you are a member of UMNO penang kindly enlighten me masa press conference Penang UMNO macam mana Datuk Ahmad Ibrahim ada di situ duduk satu meja dengan ketua bahagian yang lain? Bukankah dia telah di gantung keahliannya? Kalau nak datang sebagai observer takpa tapi tak boleh duduk semeja waktu press conference kerana itu mewakili ketua ketua bahagian lepastu boloeh le? Apasal Penang UMNO tak mahu ikut arahan MT ni? Depa besak sangatkah? Tentang Pak Lah punya usul terus nak ikut pa nie?Ini lah penyakit Penang UMNO yang saya lihat masih terus dibelengui oleh warlord2 yang menjahanamkan UMNO, maafye pls forward this thing to Datuk Azhar(Uncle Bob) kata tot tegurni!

September 23, 2008 10:44 AM

his comment as below

Blogger DR NOVANDRI HASAN BASRI said...

Salam wan zaharizan,

Saya pun tidak faham dengan perangai sesetengah pemimpin2 UMNO di Penang ni.

Mungkin mereka sudah terlalu lama di sana dan perlu diundurkan sama ada secara terhormat atau pun undi ahli-ahli UMNO.

September 23, 2008 1:48 PM

Sunday, September 14, 2008

UMNO MUST CHANGE! That is my blog for today. UMNO must change to make herself relevant. To me sincerely it is a dinosaur and it does not evolve soon than I am afraid they is no hope for the party. I have to add I am not a member of UMNO but I am a lover of my Malay race. To me if UMNO is gone than the party that protect the Malays is gone. Some people may add we have the Malay Rulers but since the constitutional crisis 1988 their wings have been clip. Now they are beholden to the executive. I am sad at this turn of event but the sign were already there. I maintain the fault does not lies with the President,changing the leader is not the problem it just that the image of UMNO has been severely beaten especially after March 8.

I've met the producer of the documentary 10 tahun sebelum merdeka which was highly praise. He was a young energetic leftist. The story was about the Hartal which occur before independence, he talk about the PUTERA-AMCJA council as though he was an expert on history, sadly what he says is true but skewered. I won't go in detail of the Joint Coucil but please go here to find out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-Malaya_Council_of_Joint_Action

That is the reason when you hide history and skewered them, when the youth ( from the help of the web) find out the 'truth' to them it is a holy grail. You need to talk them point blank and explain the fallacy of the coalition, of which I am aware off. Granted UMNO was founded by Malay elite which after being coddle by the British found out after the war their privilege was taken away, true the Sultan of Johore who supported was incense that his power as an independent ruler was curtail yet this was the party that unite the Malays. True before the war PKMM was the first Malay National party founded but generally it did not attrct the elite and the royals to participate. It cause a buzz with the rural people but that is far as it goes. It was Malayan Unoin and 1946 that UMNO manage to unite them although many join because of selfish reason but join they did. Now UMNO has lost her relevance to the masses. It is sad.

Not because the ideals she espoused but what she has become. The leaders are look upon as corrupted by the Malays. They are loath by the young Malays to them UMNO means corrupt and evil. What ever that comes from the leaders mouth is regarded as lies and yet it does continue to lie. Leaders are fighting among themselves and if this is not curtail soon it will be the bane of UMNO. Again I said changing the leader is not the solution granted he is weak but UMNO need an overhaul, leaders which are contempt need to be sack or put in cold storage, Branch Division Chief must hold swayy to the party not the party to him as it is now. So action againts them could be met out judiciously.

Below are two news which provide a earful to the idea of revamp and image which has gone wrong in UMNO, one was written by Marina Mahathir the other one by a reporter. I hope my readers would then conccur with me.

Let Us Not be Fooled....

In case any of you didn't see this yesterday:

PAS MP Lodges Report Against Khir Toyo

By: Maria J.Dass (Thu, 11 Sep 2008)


SHAH ALAM (Sept 11, 2008): Kota Raja Member of Parliament Dr Siti Mariah Mahmud has lodged a police report against former Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo and website pembelamelayu.com for spreading malicious slander and lies about certain quarters pressuring the state authorities to tone down the call to prayer at mosque and surau in the state.

When contacted, Siti Mariah, who is also PAS central committee member, said the police must investigate and act on this immediately as malicious lies can ruin racial and religious harmony.

Pembelamelayu.com quoting Mohd Khir in his blog said Seputeh MP and Puchong Assemblyman Theresa Kok had supported a petition by the Chinese in Kinrara against the azan (call to morning prayer) in their area.

The website also alleged that Seri Serdang assemblyman Satim Diman had raised the issue at the state assembly but did not get a response.

In her report lodged at the Dang Wangi police headquarters today, Siti Mariah said Mohd Khir's statement, published in Utusan Malaysia on Tuesday, was "malicious and aimed at raising the anger and anxiety of Malay Muslims".

"This action by Khir, the blog and Utusan Malaysia is an obvious attempt to manipulate the sentiments of the Malay and Muslim people," Siti Mariah said.

She said newspapers should verify the facts before publishing such reports.
(The Utusan Malaysia report quoted Khir, but Kok's name was not mentioned.)

"As a Muslim, I was upset when I read the article, but upon checking with Teresa, I found out that she had not been involved in the petition at all."

She added that she obtained a copy of the state assembly Hansard from the Speaker's office and found that allegations that Satim was ordered to remain seated when he brought up the issue at the state assembly was unfounded.

She said it is understood that committees of the mosques involved have also lodged reports with the police against the unfounded allegations.

When contacted, Mohd Khir said: "Let the police to investigate the allegations."

Asked if he stood by the statements made, Mohd Khir said: "A report has been lodged, so I don't want to say anything more on the matter."

On Wednesday, Kok, referring to the article published on PembelaMelayu.com, denied even receiving such a complaint from residents and said she personally had no problems with the prayer calls.

Kok had also demanded a retraction and apology from Mohd Khir, Utusan Malaysia, its writer Zaini Hassan and Satim.

Taken from Marina mahathir blog.

A question of insecurity

COMMENTARY

SEPT 13 - Ops Lalang in 1987 ended Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's flirtation with openness and in eerily similar circumstance, polemics of race relations have culminated in a fresh round of Internal Security Act (ISA) arrests yesterday under the watch of handpicked successor Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Abdullah took office and, with a 91 percent majority in 2004, promised transparency and rule of law, but the dismal results of the March 8 elections has made his leadership unstable and untenable as Umno politicians carp at his indecisiveness and Dr Mahathir himself has thrown everything but the kitchen sink to oust the prime minister.

Therefore, the latest ISA arrests appear to be a repeat of Dr Mahathir's act of putting away 106 politicians and activists and shutting down newspapers when leadership is threatened and power appears to be slipping away.

In Dr Mahathir's case, it was the party clash with Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah and tense race ties between Malays and Chinese over vernacular education set off by then Education Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's decision to appoint non-Chinese educated administrators in Chinese schools.

In Abdullah's case, an unhappy Umno and Malay ground together with equally unhappy non-Malays coupled with the looming Sept 16 deadline by Anwar to topple Abdullah's government has pushed the prime minister to draw the line and take action.

That action has led to DAP leader Teresa Kok, journalist Tan Hoon Cheng and prominent blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin, being detained up to 60 days for investigations under the ISA while three newspapers have been issued show-cause notices for their reporting.

Ironically, one of the three newspapers - Sin Chew Daily - was closed down in the 1987 Ops Lalang.

The government has given security grounds and threats to public order for the arrest of Raja Petra, a harsh government critic who already faces a few criminal and civil court dates for his articles in the Malaysia Today news portal.

As for Kok, newspapers report it could be related to allegations that she asked mosques in her state constituency to reduce the volume of prayer calls while Tan is being held for her report on Umno Penang warlord Datuk Ahmad Ismail's racist rant that saw him punished with a three-year suspension from party office.

Then and now, those arrested have been far removed from those who stoke the racial tensions and endanger the security and public order of the nation.

Then and now, messengers get shot but not the perpetrators.

Then and now, is it the security of the nation or the insecurity of the ruling politicians that has led to these arrests?


The lonely world of Umno

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 13 - The crisis that Malaysia"s United Malays National Organisation (Umno) is now in has two correlated sources. First, its hold on power has always depended on it being at the head of a coalition. Second, it has always been a party given to internal strife.

The party was after all formed defensively in 1946 by a broad spectrum of Malay leaders bent on quashing British post-war plans to simplify the governance of its peninsular colonies. The Malays feared that the British were playing them out and that they were in danger of being permanently disadvantaged vis-�-vis non-Malay colonial subjects.

It was only after its second president, Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra, took over in 1951 that Umno became a party that was on the offensive. It adopted a positive goal full independence for Malaya.

However, it was not a strong party in itself. Although the Tunku worked the ground very thoroughly in the beginning and read the situation correctly, it would take him a while to whip up support for the new direction along which he would take the party.

What proved a decisive moment and one in which he was not involved was when an electoral coalition was worked out in February 1952 between the Selangor branch of the Malayan Chinese Association (MCA) and Umno"s Kuala Lumpur Division. This experiment proved highly successful in ensuing local elections, catching many, including the Tunku, by surprise.

One whole year would pass before a national network of Umno-MCA liaison committees was finally set up. This took place on March 16, 1953, and with that, the Alliance was established. The Malayan Indian Congress (MIC) would join in April 1954 to make the picture perfect.

What this short history reveals is that it is coalitions that rule Malaysia, not parties. And for that to be possible, each race-based party in the coalition must enjoy the trust of its community.

Umno"s strength has always been directly tied to the support and strength of its non-Malay allies. Conversely, its crises are also tied to their crises. Umno could never, and can never, rule alone, or even act as if it did or does.

When the MCA lost Chinese support in 1969, the Alliance went into crisis. Now, when the MIC is abandoned by Indian voters and the Parti Gerakan Rakyat by Chinese voters, the Barisan Nasional (BN) suffers the same fate.

So, how could so hegemonic a system as the BN end up in such a predicament? To get the answer, one needs to understand the balance that Umno, the dominant party, has to maintain between the support it can enjoy from its allies and the strength that these allies must retain in order to survive.

The two are symbiotically connected. Since the strength of a race-based party depends on it being seen by its community to be standing up for its collective interests, a coalition of race-based parties must play an intricate game where the strong limits itself so that the weak are not neutered.

Everyone must be seen to be strong.

This seemed too tall an order for a party as strong as Umno to keep. It saw itself grow from strength to strength over the years, and saw how its allies grew more and more compliant.

It was easy for Umno"s leaders and members to forget how necessary the aforementioned tactical balance was to the well being of the BN.

The leader of its Youth wing began waving an unsheathed keris at the party"s general assemblies, and even the president of the party, and Prime Minister of the country at that, received the gift of the National Flag taken up into space by the first Malaysian sent there, as head of the party, and not as head of the country.

Double standards favouring Umno members became a common occurrence, and a blind eye was turned only when it suited party members.

What such acts by Umno and its members accomplished was to show the general public that the mutual aid principle that the BN relied upon was dead.

Once this became clear to voters, the rational choice open to them was to abandon the coalition. This was made easier by the fact that the opposition parties managed to provide what appeared a viable alternative.

Umno"s hubris grew from it forgetting that it stood on the shoulders of the BN, and that it had never been, and can never be, powerful enough to rule by itself.

Through prolonged lack of training, it lost the strategic skills that the system depended upon. The negotiating attitude that race-based parties need, not as a matter of good manners but as a matter of good tactic, in order to function as a coalition was forgotten.

But as so many porcelain shops teach us, -once broken, considered sold-.

Once hubris has set in, there is no turning back.

Najib's predicament

Kuala Lumpur, Sept 13 Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak is in a dilemma.

If he does not break with the two-year transition plan and move to oust Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, he risks having his dirty linen hung out in public by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

Sources told the Malaysian Insider that the ultimatum was given to Najib by the former prime minister at a recent meeting.' In Perlis yesterday, Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir said his father had told Najib to "go against Abdullah or expect to be finished off".

Najib has reason to be concerned. He served under Dr Mahathir for more than two decades and the latter was privy to all his secrets.

The DPM has supported Abdullah's plan to hand over power to him in mid 2010, saying that it was in the party tradition to have an orderly transition. He has also resisted many attempts by Dr Mahathir, since the Election 2008 debacle, to force Abdullah out of office before the party elections in December.

But yesterday, Najib seemed to be wavering. Asked about Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin's call for the PM to leave office before December, he said party delegates should decide on the transition plan.

Umno divisions will have their meetings and elections in October when they will also nominate candidates for senior positions in the party, including the president and deputy president's posts. Najib's statement yesterday is being interpreted by some as a sign that he will be prepared to accept nominations for the top position in Umno.

The power broker of Penang

PENANG, Sept 13 The political life of Mr Ahmad Ismail the man who has refused to say sorry reads like a primer on the system of patronage by which Umno has, for decades, maintained order in the party.

From being a little-known albeit powerful state political leader, the Umno division chief of the Bukit Bendera constituency in Penang has now been catapulted onto the national stage for all the wrong reasons.

To the Chinese, Mr Ahmad is a racist and a bigot accusations that he denies strongly although he has admitted to describing the Chinese as -squatters- and -immigrants- while on the stump during the Permatang Pauh by-election last month.

Mr Ahmad, 53, insisted days after the remark was reported that he was quoted out of context, claiming that he was talking to a Malay crowd about the Chinese in a historical context.

On Wednesday, Mr Ahmad was suspended for three years from Umno, which had been under pressure by its Chinese partners in the Barisan Nasional coalition to take strong action against the defiant politician.

HIS PAST ANWAR LINK

For Mr Ahmad one of the most powerful Umno warlords in Penang, the home state of embattled Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi this is not the first time that he has had a run-in with the party"s top leadership.

Ten years ago, he was almost expelled from Umno for being an active member of Mr Anwar Ibrahim"s reformasi movement.

Following Mr Anwar"s sacking from all his government and Umno posts, the former Deputy Prime Minister, until his arrest, had toured the country to whip up support for himself and against then-Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad. Constantly at Mr Anwar"s side during those tumultuous days was Mr Ahmad.

Despite his public display of support for a fallen politician, Mr Ahmad was, in the end, spared of any punishment as he chose not to leave Umno to join Mr Anwar"s newly-formed party. Mr Ahmad remained useful to the Umno"s senior leadership as a local warlord.

It could be said that Mr Ahmad had reason to be loyal to Mr Anwar, a fellow Penangnite.

When Mr Anwar was Finance Minister, he had approved the privatisation of a government project to build an outer ring road in Penang to a company controlled by Mr Ahmad, who comes from a family of contractors.

The project was recently put off by the federal government.

Their close ties earned Mr Ahmad a place in the list of -Anwar cronies- that was released during the Umno General Assembly in 1998 and 1999 by Dr Mahathir to counter criticisms from the Anwar camp that the Prime Minister had practised cronyism.

The list offered a glimpse into the patronage system by which Umno operated, whereby strong and influential party members, such as Mr Ahmad, were given business contracts or projects that were reserved for bumiputras (sons of the soil) under the government"s affirmative action programme.

And in Penang, Mr Ahmad was then and still is the most powerful warlord of them all. Even his business troubles in recent years appear to have done little to diminish his political standing.

In May 2006, Mr Ahmad was declared bankrupt by the Insolvency Department and was removed as a councillor on the Penang Island Municipal Council.

He was later reinstated to the post after obtaining a stay of execution of the bankruptcy order although he had to give it up again since he had served the maximum term of four years as councillor.

Earlier this month, the Penang Development Corporation made a police report, asking for an investigation into the now-defunct Popular Profile, of which Mr Ahmad was director, for allegedly cheating the state of

RM500,000 ($208,000) following a botched land transaction in 1998.

The company wound up in 2005.

In an interview with The Star, Mr Ahmad said the issue had nothing to do with him since he had resigned from the company before any action was taken against it.

A MAN OF POWER

As a sign of his importance in the Penang political pantheon, when federal ministers from Kuala Lumpur fly in for a visit, Mr Ahmad will be invited to be among the main VIP guests.

So powerful is Mr Ahmad in this Chinese-majority state that he frequently gave former Chief Minister Dr Koh Tsu Koon a hard time for not doing enough to help Penang Malays.

And Mr Ahmad could get away with such actions because Dr Koh, who remains the state BN chief, and other senior officials from his Gerakan party were beholden to the Umno politician for his political support.

As the man who controls the Umno machinery, including party workers , in Penang, Mr Ahmad"s support can make a difference between victory and defeat for a Gerakan or any other BN candidate during an election.

-The fact is that even the Prime Minister depends on our Datuk Ahmad for support,- one Penang Umno official told Weekend Xtra.

Last week, when Mr Abdullah chaired a state-level Umno meeting to discuss the mounting racial tensions arising from Mr Ahmad"s remarks, many had expected him to censure the Bukit Bendera chief.

Instead, the Umno president came out of the meeting telling reporters that the Penang politician was not a racist.

Mr Abdullah"s defence of Mr Ahmad was not surprising given that other local division chiefs had rallied round him during the meeting.

To act otherwise would put Mr Abdullah at the risk of losing the support of Umno divisions in his own home state something that he could not afford given his weakened political position following the March 8 general elections.

Of course, Umno was eventually forced to suspend Mr Ahmad because of threats from Gerakan and the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) to leave the BN coalition a move which could hand power over to Mr Ahmad"s old friend, MrAnwar.

Still, Mr Ahmad remains unrepentant and insists that he will not apologise a position which has turned him into something of a hero among many Umno members. Such defiance has also given a fillip to forces within the party who want Mr Abdullah to leave sooner, rather than later, as Prime

Minister.

At a time when Malaysia"s economic and political situation has made it difficult for the traditional patronage system to function like it used to in the past, political warlords like Mr Ahmad will continue to hold sway suspension or not. TODAY

'

Friday, September 12, 2008

This article is nice I would comment on it later on but it is something we should read and bear in mind.

Thursday August 28, 2008

Looking at our own reflection

A writer's life
By DINA ZAMAN


Every race has rivalry, jealousy and envy. But all the bluster about superiority only hides a deep inferiority complex.

RECENT events that had the country fluctuate from a variety of emotions, has many Malays wondering: what is it to be Malay now, and has race become the only identifying factor in a Malay (man)’s life?

Has the Malay race become emasculated over the years, due to a public policy that had good intentions but was not administered properly?

The men I spoke to for this article were bewildered by the recent turn of events, and honest enough to concede that the race is regressing to a dark age.

All this bluster about being a superior race in the country hides a deep inferiority complex about themselves.

And with certain channels trumping the race card at practically every nook and cranny, was it any wonder that the Malays, especially so, Malay men felt threatened?

One of the things that cropped up in my discussions with these gentlemen was the issue of a ‘throw-away culture’ that contemporary Malays employ when it comes to their traditions, customs and heritage.

The Arabisation of Malay-Muslim life is not a pretty sight to them. Slowly going are pretty tudung girls in pretty baju kurung, who now don long tunics and sombre scarves. “What’s wrong with our baju kurung? They cover the aurat, don’t they?”

The issue of language and heritage is another that begs to be questioned. The Chinese send their children to vernacular schools, and are taught Chinese history. They send their children to calligraphy and other cultural classes.

Now why is it that modern Malay parents have abolished what was once the pride of Malay life?

Writing in Jawi, reading writers like Shahnon Ahmad and histories like Sejarah Melayu are considered to be the playground of academics, literary eccentrics, and those who are buying up our culture, our heritage are wealthy non-Malays, who really do appreciate all that is Malay.

Instead we adopt not necessarily healthy customs that are deemed in keeping with Islam (which is really more about non-Malay(sian) traditions and not about the faith at all).

Perhaps, it is suggested, the Malays are still insecure.

They have the compunction of adopting other cultures, because they don’t appreciate their own language and customs.

They are unable to think and analyse critically; but ape others that do.

Could this be that as a politicised race, the Malays do not have a thousand year history of tradition and culture?

What existed before is being aggressively erased from our psyche.

What is noticeable is that many young Malays hunger for material and physical wealth. They want it fast.

The proliferation of multi-level marketing companies selling from herbal to car products, and unit trust agents show that they want to be more than what they are now.

Having attended enough MLM and motivational talks with a predominantly young Malay audience, I am always left to wonder. Is this it? Is to be rich and look good the pinnacle of Malay success?

At the risk of sounding naïve and idealistic, whatever happened to values like savings, good moral principles and social justice?

Korang tau la, camne orang lain pandang kat kita ? jadi kita kena sukses! Kita kena belajar buat duit macam Cina! Bila ada kete besar, handbag mahal ? orang pandang lain babe ? challenge!”(You know how people look down on us, so we must be successful! We must learn to make money like the Chinese! When you have a big car, expensive handbags ? people look at you differently! This is a challenge!)

“Challenge!” was the ever-present war cry I kept hearing at the many MLM lectures I attended.

However, is wanting material success wrong?

The NEP hasn’t really made all Malays rich, and at the lower rung of the economic ladder are still the Malays.

Who doesn’t want to look good and feel good? Who doesn’t want to have money and not worry?

Another thing that cripples the Malays is what my respondents termed dengki Melayu.

When it was pointed out that every race and its people also practised rivalry, jealousy and envy among themselves, the men nodded but stressed that the Malays will not succeed if they are intent on destroying themselves.

The current politics of the country and the lack or rather the refusal to have an incorruptible system for anything – from applying for tenders to a job promotion – has given the adage “dog eat dog” a new twist.

“You get really good Malays who are as good as expatriates, but you don’t nurture them, promote them, because one, you’re intimidated by them, and two, they don’t play ball. They’re not going to brownnose you and aren’t part of a certain circle, so why bother with them?”

On the other extreme is a minority group a friend termed the “marginalised Malays”.

In his e-mail he wrote, “Frankly, although I am as Malay as they come, I feel 'race-less' in everyday life. 'Race' is so unimportant to me. The only 'race' I care about is car races and racing cars.”

Seriously, have you ever wondered about the ‘marginalised Malays’? Yes, there are in fact Malays who are marginalised by their own race! These are the Malays who do not conform to the mainstream Malay ideas, character, way of life, thinking and what have you.

These are the Malays whose girlfriend/wife/daughters do not wear tudung. They probably even drink alcohol and love the good life.

They could sit and argue and debate about all things in life (religion included) and they believe they are open minded and intelligent enough to engage with anybody, race and creed notwithstanding. The truth is they are neither here nor there.

Not accepted by mainstream Malays (some are even branded pengkhianat bangsa) nor are they accepted as equals by non-Malays.

They walk into high powered corporate meetings attended by non-Malays (even Caucasians) and all eyes would observe these Malays while thinking, in their head, “here comes the product of the NEP” when in truth the NEP had embarrassed these Malays to no end as they could well stand up to anybody regardless of race.

These is the “marginalised Malay”. Unhappy in his/her own turf and looked down by non-Malays as being “just another NEP Malay”. Ironic but true!

An old boyfriend wondered out aloud, whether all this self-reflection meant anything at all. After all, it’s only rituals like attending weddings and funerals, for instance that reminded us of our heritage.

Did we wake up in the mornings saying, I am a Malay (man or woman)? He didn’t think so, as Man was preoccupied with bills to pay and family to care for. This pondering is not going to help the race or country at all.

I received a text from an old friend, Mr What If: “I love this country. I have seen many a man caught up in his own self-importance and let everybody down. I want you to write about the need to bring Malay(sians) back to earth and to start again. Is that feasible?”

Is it?

Thursday, September 11, 2008

This is an email I written to a 'friend' regarding what was written in the star thursday 11 september 2008

Indira

It was nice reading an article but sadly too much verbose but very little of what she was trying to convey. I have been asking myself that also, it seems that term has been hijack by many would be Malays especially those Jawi peranakans whom I am not fond off. Granted some of them have legitamacy but many now are just for the privilege that comes of being Malay. I remember when Tunku gave us independence these 'strong' jawi were given a chance to be a Malay by having a bin instead son of, many refuse. To them they were Indians and proud of that. later many drop the son of and walla take bin as to give them legitimacy. It is said that our former PM was such person, but then he never thinks like a Malay does he? Our PM in waiting too has strong Indian blood, family is just second generation and yet the suspended Division Chief of a state who is of jawi blood can call the Chinese Pendatang while he himself is not, I wonder what going to happen next.

What is then a Malay? Is Farish Noor one? He is from Jelutong Penang and if going by Hitler standard none i know of is Malay. Tun Razak is one the Other Prime Minister have Siamese Indian or Turk (Caucasian) blood running through their vein. The PM is also mix her mother is half chinese if I am not mistaken. So what makes a Malay, anyway? You?, I doubt so, you are far remove of understanding malay as I am. So tell me if i can ask you what is a malay to you? Anthropologist do not recognize malay as a distinct group.Anthropology defines only 5 Races in the World . The Caucasoids, Negroids, Mongoloids, The Dravidian, and the Austronesian. Any other species is merely a combination of the above 5 main groupings. Geographically, Malaysia falls within the Austronesian Category yet we do not belong in that group. We are Mongoloid unlike the proto Malays who are Austronesian and they have common features with the Aborigines of Australia. We are seafarers thus that is why when we establish our kingdom macam Farish Noor cakap by the river mouth. Your Ancestor were pirates just like Drake was and Elizabeth was too. We travel far and wide as far hawaii to the east and New Zealand to the south. But we never go beyond Sumatra. I do not know why it was only after magellan did malays go westward and establish herself in Seychelles and South Africa. Some went there as inmates some as sailors.

Yet I need to stress race is a questionable and dubious pursuit. To me what make me a malay is my culture and beliefs. Not faith never equate belief with faith, this is wrong. We belief in magic, we believe in ghosts and other worlds, our culture reflect that belief. Because we are young civilisation wise we are earthy, that means our make up and understanding of life is grounded kepada bumi. That is why every think we do , dance or wayang kulit, or main wau we will start by chanting verses invoking all the dewas and djinn. We believes in amulets and tok guru whose word could heal. All this are foolish things but beautiful nevertheless. Nowdays we sanitize this believe, we say it is wrong but this is what make us Malay. Instead of Shaman we cling to Tok Gurus or politicians who can go up the mimbar therefore he is maasum, they are now the new dewas whom we invoke. We arabise ourselve thinking we are doing the right thing but in the end it is the malays who are like lost lamb not knowing what they are. In japan and Indonesia these thing never happen. They are strong culturally because their belief coexist with their faith it gave them strength.

I am not saying that some beliefs is against the faith but it is my sincere feeling that when we embrace the religion in the 13th/14th century we still have this belief. The Missionaries who came knew that this is the strength of the community and leave it to change evolutionary and not abruptly as what happen now. Don't tell me those people who came before us knew not what is right and wrong? Now, increasingly we are trying to forget roots yet, the more we try the people still believe in shaman and horror periodicals and movies is doing roaring business, why? Because you do not meddle with this belief, I blame what happen to the malays now because they themselve ar enot sure what is a Malay like you.

I do not mind working with H, I wish to be part of the study. I love meeting him/her but not you. I wish your what if well and perhaps he could go and discover what to be a Malay all about .

Sincerely

Wan

This is the article in question

From P. Ramlee types to high brows

A WRITER'S LIFE
By DINA ZAMAN


Putting a handle on the Malay Malaysian can be mind boggling. It depends on who you talk to and what his life experiences are.

I DON’T believe that all Malay men and women are lazy, idiotic and lost causes. I know of many who work so hard to feed their families, and I have met with very kind-hearted people in my field of work.

I have met with women who come from traditional backgrounds who volunteer to assist People Living With HIV and street kids; and I have a good bunch of Malay male friends who try to make me fat when we meet for makan, and have been supportive of my career.

What we questioned when we met throughout the month of August was this: Was all this angst about being Malay, and the what-nots, a middle-class thing?

The working class, according to Zaidel, is more concerned with livelihood. As a local graduate who comes from a lower middle class background, and has now a study loan to service, all this was just pure drivel.

“I’m assuming from the comments in your Facebook notes and emails, that all these people have non-technical degrees. Law, politics, communications and so forth. Me and my friends – we’re geeks,” she said.

“We see things differently. We don’t want to be what these aspirants want to be: middle class. Frankly I think we have this P Ramlee syndrome. And another thing, all that talk about being ashamed of the NEP, yet how much it has helped them. Oh another thing, why are they so ashamed of speaking in Malay?”

No one is defending the salaried man. The Working Class, be it Malay, Chinese, Indian or everyone Malaysian. And that is what Barisan Nasional or whoever it is must look into.

“See all this intellectualising by these supposedly English speaking liberals – and may I borrow a quote from former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad – detached intellectual discourse by intellectuals who want to display their intellect? You think the grassroots really care what they say?” Zaidel asked.

Two weeks ago, I had written an article based on my meetings with my male friends.

They were from their mid 20s to their early 50s. Most of them were locally educated, and a good number came from working class to middle class backgrounds.

One didn’t have a degree but is now a successful bonds trader, and while four benefited from scholarships, the rest took loans or paid their way through university.

One spoke to me in Queen’s English, all plumy and marbles, three spoke to me in fluent Malay – because they spoke and thought in Malay at work, home, play and they were proud of it – and the rest communicated in the hybrid we use when we speak with friends: English, and then Malay, then back to English (no, not Manglish).

One felt he was a marginalised Malay, and for that, I paid the price, for quoting him, because as far as the rest of Malay-Malaysia was concerned, he erred on the ethno-religious aspect and hence his views were not valid and not to be considered.

What puzzled H, my partner in crime, who operates a research centre, and I, were the vitriolic emails wanting the poor marginalised Malay man’s blood for even daring to speak up about his love of plonk.

I had written about my respondents’ feelings about culture, the NEP, their fear that the Malays as a race would die if we kept on insisting on being dependent on a welfare state and throwing away everything that was their heritage.

And that was all some of my rabid readers zeroed on.

And yes, the jubah issue. All two men asked was whether Malay women were embarrassed by their national costumes, that that was why they chose to wear the jubah. My Facebook and email creaked from the flurry of comments.

Let me get this straight: these men did not imply that wearing the hijab meant a woman was backwards. Their wives wore the tudung! Hence, this has led me to think that a good many people out there do not understand language, its nuances and complexities. They read what they want to read, and if need be, create the reality and impose that on the article (and others). I’d say something more rude, but it’s bulan puasa.

All these brickbats were good. Keep them coming, for H and I plan to work on a project and are seeking funding: its working title is Minda Melayu. We’re planning field studies and a poll of what Malay Malaysians really think about race (their own and others) and Malaysia. When this takes off, I’ll be doing this wearing a suit of armour, and a huge pile of Xanax in my handbag.

And so the comments and emails came in fast and furious. A good number who did benefit from the NEP realised that the NEP was weakening the race, while another good number disagreed.

One wrote in and told me that we Malaysians should be grateful we’re not poor Bangladeshis; to which I responded, we Malaysians have a lot to learn from Bangladesh.

Obviously the poor sod has not heard of the Grameen Bank and Bengali laureates like Rabindranath Tagore and Amyrta Sen. And why, I asked the reader, couldn’t we aspire to have public amenities that are given to the Swedes, Norwegians, such as paid maternity and paternity leave, excellent public safety and healthcare, for instance?

“Oh, itu negara kafir.”

August and September have proven to be very highly entertaining and informative months. Mr What If and I met and discussed whether he’d make a great Pahlawan Melayu (fella’s having a crisis: he’s half Malay and half white).

Over the last weekend, two pieces of news entered the public consciousness. One was a short interview with Dr Sham Rahayu Ab. Aziz who likened egalitarian Malays to poison to their own race, and that there was a huge difference between liberal Malays and constitutionalised Malays (Melayu Perlembagaan).

The other, by Muaz Omar, was a commentary about disassociating Malays from Malay supremacy. The earlier news piece was picked up by a blog, and the comments drove home the point that while all this clamour is good because we have been so repressed (!), we are warring among ourselves. Sept 16 is around the corner. Will race and faith no longer be relevant if changes are afoot?

Madame Dina and her crystal ball says more sandiwara will happen. Aummmm.

Friday, September 05, 2008

This is a comment I posted on Che Det. This is my believe of what is happening now.

By wan zaharizan on September 4, 2008 4:22 PM

Salam Tun

I know sometimes we get frustrated but even under your administration you muzzle the media. But when you came to the office you held so much promises, your ideas was revolutionary but you also a man who does not brooch dissent. Papers under the control of your people muzzle any journalist of repute. The thing is what set you apart is that you are a leader while Pak lah is being led. You decide while he seek advice. You stand by your decision he wavers. He is too democratic a leader which serve no purporse. He is not resolute enough to lead but you choose him for his amiable ways. You decide through him you can influence. You were wrong for Pak Lah his family is paramount thus he made the mistake by listening to his son and his 'menantu'. Apa nak buat, whom could have guess Khairy could be his son in law, it was his bane. Sadly he is not you. You have a cotories of intelectuals with you, and you read a lot, he surround himself with lackeys who in the end would damage his reputation to no what. He sleeps through much of any taklimat given to him you ask too much question. His resignation would not solve the problem of UMNO it would ease but would not solve. The trouble is UMNO has lost her shine. Partly because of you UMNO has attracted not technocrat and brilliant malays to join it but Warlords of yore. In the youth eyes they are disillusioned by what they saw. To them UMNO is corrupted and vile. For that you are responsible. UMNO must have a paradigm shift, both in outlook and style. It must hanker to the old days where the members goes down and not fighting for position. If UMNO dont change bringing down Pak Lah would not solve the problem.

By wan zaharizan on September 7, 2008 2:24 PM

Salam Tun

Your blogs have too much commentators, I doubt very much you read them , and if you do have the time, you would choose and select. The trouble with UMNO is not that they play racial politics and I concur with Prof Khoo Kay Kim that racial politics in Malaysia will always be the norm here in Malaysia as long as identification by race in all forms are not erase. In Indonesia people are indonesian first. In their official form to be fill we are ask whether we are indonesians or others here in Malaysia the blanks are more. We are ask to tick whether we are Chinese Indian Malay or others not Malaysians or others. Vernacular school is supported and continue to strive, so before anyone call me others as racist look inward first. I am a racist but not a chauvinist. I am all for Malay rights as long as it did not infringe on other races rights. Racist is to me is a person who loves he or her race more and for that I am guilty. It is blasphemous of me to say I am not Malay but it equally wrong for me to take away people's wealth because I am a Malay. It is not wrong for me to fight for my race as long fighting does not cloud my emotions. I am against prejudices but i cannot help being one at times but my religion help me to guide me. It is my baramoter. What Datuk Ahmad did is not wrong because he is stating a fact and it was taken out of context. But he should also say he is also ada darah pendatang. Apa tidaknya darah India mengalir di tubuhnya. He is a Jawi Peranakan. What is wrong also was not to say he was sorry but he was not conciliatory.
Conciliatory is one of the budaya of the Malays which I am fond of. But being Jawi Peranakan dia tidak tahu adat. He could have said" I am sorry if my words have hurt other Malaysians but believe me it was said during a discourse of history and was base on facts. For that I can't apologize." Now by saying that it would have appease others and still keep his maruah. Sayangnye Pak Lah can't even keep this warlord in check. Yes, he is one of the famous malay warlords in UMNO whom I despise for being corrputed and uncooth. Orang Penang kenal sama Ahmad Ismail. But the thing was under you, this warlord were keep in check, one of the famous one is the late Datuk Attar Aziz the Batu Road UMNO division chief. If this warlord was necessary in UMNO then keeping them in check is important for UMNO president. Pak lah fail. Remember the late Datuk Zack, who built a palatial palace on a tol land? Pak Lah fail then too. So enough said to me the President has shown his weaknesses for all to see. And if the downfall happen it is because of him.